From Starbucks to Google: how 2017 became the year of corporate activism

As Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz pledges to hire 10,000 refugees, companies across the world are waving their political neutralitiy to oppose or support Brexit and Donald Trump. We break down the superbrands that are speaking out
Activism rebranded: Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz pledged to hire 10,000 refugees over the next five years
2016 Getty Images

It's not just the flat whites at Starbucks that are getting heated. Days after President Trump’s immigration ban was announced the coffee giant’s chairman Howard Schultz (below) pledged to hire 10,000 refugees over the next five years in response to what he called “the conscience of our country, and the promise of the American Dream, being called into question”. He wasn’t the only one letting off steam.

This is the year of corporate activism, as companies waive their political neutrality to oppose (or support) Brexit and Donald Trump. Google, Uber, Nando’s and Ikea have all joined Starbucks on the front line. Apple chief executive Tim Cook wrote a memo to staff saying the company believes in the importance of immigration, while Airbnb, Facebook and Amazon have spoken out about the ban and Netflix CEO Reed Hastings said: “Trump’s actions are so un-American it pains us all.”

Raoul Shah, CEO of Exposure Promotions and a member of the Superbrands Council, says: “Today consumers want brands they admire to speak out. In our digital age where access is so easy, consumers understand much better exactly what a brand stands for. The expectation, therefore, is for brands to stand up and be counted and to reflect what their consumers are thinking.”

Bean counting

Corporate activism boosts exposure. Starbucks’s Twitter following jumped by 5,124, an 11-fold increase on its daily average, after Schultz’s announcement. But it has also run into hot water. #BoycottStarbucks trended on social media, with its Facebook page racking up comments such as: “Upon hearing about your decision to hire refugees instead of Americans I will no longer spend any money at Starbucks.”

Nando’s and don’ts

Likewise, Nando’s launched the hashtag #EveryoneIsWelcome during Trump’s inauguration week. Not everyone welcomed it. “Hey @NandosUSA, stop patronising people,” tweeted Breitbart London editor-in-chief Raheem Kassam. “No one cares about your politics. It’s just chicken.” Breitbart was founded by Trump’s chief strategist, Steve Bannon, and many with Kassam’s political inclinations will want to see a separation between chicken and state. How hard is it to get the balance right?

“It’s hard to judge a brands’ intentions when it takes a ‘moral’ stance,” says Faraz Aghaei, co-founder of creative agency The Clerkenwell Brothers. “Do people want their favourite ketchup brand to have a view on FGM? Probably not. It’s nice when brands have an opinion but whether we buy them will still probably come down to price, promotion and product.”

Women's marches around the world

1/13

The big Ikea

It’s harder to remonstrate with companies like Ikea, whose affordable, robust flatpack refugee shelter won the Beazley Design of the Year award 2016 last Friday. “Private-sector innovation in the humanitarian world often has a bad name,” says Dr Tom Corsellis, executive director of NGO Shelter Centre. “There’s a sense that they keep throwing us gadgets we don’t need. But the Better Shelter is a real improvement. It offers a chance for basic, dignified living.”

Ikea's Better Shelter refugee housing won the Beazley Design of the Year Award 
Märta Terne

Brin it on

Google co-founder Sergey Brin, left, joined protesters at San Francisco International Airport over the weekend, albeit “in a personal capacity”. Brin’s family emigrated from the Soviet Union to the US in 1979 to escape anti-Semitic persecution.

Corporate activism is often personal — which can be a good marketing tool. “When Sergey Brin comforts people at SFO, Google shows it’s not just a search engine,” says Nadim Sadek, CEO of brand consultancy TransgressiveX. “Brands that give back are the ones you engage better with. That’s money, in the end.”

Uber and out

Even the most successful “brandwagon” can take a wrong turn. Uber has been at the vanguard of corporate activism, creating a narrative about its mission to disrupt an ineffective market and empower drivers through technology. But after the New York Taxi Workers Alliance called on its members to avoid John F Kennedy International Airport in solidarity with protesters against Trump’s Muslim travel ban who had gathered there, Uber lifted its surge pricing on the airport, stealing a march on its rivals. #DeleteUber swiftly began trending.

Follow Samuel Fishwick on Twitter: @Fish_o_wick

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Sign up you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy notice .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in