Watchdog warns anonymity for sex-case MPs could break Westminster practice

EXCLUSIVE: The Commons Committee on Standards warned such a move would break with current practice at Westminster
The Commons Committee on Standards warned such a move would break with current practice at Westminster
Jeremy Selwyn
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

Parliament’s sleaze watchdog has dramatically intervened over plans to give anonymity to MPs being investigated for allegedly being “sex pests”.

The Commons Committee on Standards warned such a move would break with current practice at Westminster which is based on accepted principles for public life including openness, integrity, honesty and accountability.

Labour MP Sir Kevin Barron, who chairs the committee, has written to Commons Leader Andrea Leadsom to question MPs’ names being kept secret while investigations are carried out into sexual misconduct allegations.

His letter says: “The proposed arrangements for anonymity during investigations would represent a major change from the existing system (approved by the House) whereby the Commissioner announces publicly that she is conducting an investigation into a named member or members. The committee would want to consider the implications carefully.”

He also warned of the risks that such anonymity could gradually be extended to cover other allegations against MPs. “If it is proposed that the new arrangements apply to the existing code of conduct, there might be a significant backlash on the part of the media and the general public.”

The committee backed the commitment by the Commons authorities to zero tolerance of sexual harassment, harassment and bullying. But it made clear it has concerns over the planned independent complaints and grievance policy being drawn up. “The committee felt that there are a number of challenges concerning detail and process, as well as some issues of principle, that will need to be addressed,” it added.

It also said it was a priority to ensure that the new system generated confidence complaints would be dealt with “fairly and impartially”. Sir Kevin asked for an “early opportunity” for the committee to discuss the plans with parliamentary authorities.

Ms Leadsom has warned that anonymity is needed to ensure that alleged victims of sexual harrassment feel confident that they can complain without being identified, especially given that MPs have a small number of staff.

She has also stressed that the working group is seeking to follow best practice for grievance policy outside of Parliament.

A steering group has yet to decide at which stage of the process anonymity of the alleged perpetrators would end.

MPs agreed on Wednesday to press ahead with bringing in the new grievance procedure, while recognising that some amendments may be needed.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Sign up you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy notice .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in

MORE ABOUT