Tit-for-tat row on councillor cash

Labour says Conservative Party chairman Grant Shapps scored 'a massive own goal' when he criticised a report by MPs about councillors' allowances
10 January 2013

A political row has erupted after MPs suggested that increasing town hall allowances could help attract more "capable" local councillors.

Conservative Party chairman Grant Shapps accused Labour of a "sleazy" bid to boost its own party coffers by encouraging higher payments.

But the Opposition said he had scored a "massive own goal" because Tory MPs had approved the contents of the cross-party report.

The tit-for-tat was sparked by the conclusions of an investigation into the role of councillors by the Communities and Local Government Select Committee. It found that present levels of allowances "at best, do not encourage and, at worst, deter capable people from standing for election".

The increasingly demanding role warranted "an appropriate level of compensation, especially if they have to take time off work", it said. However "the problem is exacerbated because councils are reluctant to vote for an increase for fear of the media and public reaction".

Instead, like under the new system for MPs' pay and perks, responsibility for setting allowances should be handed over to an independent local panel, it recommended. Compensation for loss of earnings, incentives for employers to support council duties and more officer support to handle casework were also recommended.

Labour MP Clive Betts, who chairs the committee which has a majority of members from coalition parties, said "legitimate" rises were being shied away from and dismissed Mr Shapps' attack as "shallow political point-scoring". Minutes show the text of the report was approved by both Conservative members present, Heather Wheeler and Mark Pawsey.

Mrs Wheeler, herself a councillor of more than 20 years' standing, said she stood by the report, including the concerns that low allowances may in some cases put off candidates.

But Mr Shapps accused Mr Betts of a "cynical and sleazy move" because Labour councillors are obliged to pass on a proportion of their allowances to the local and national party coffers. He said: "Local taxpayers will be shocked to learn that the Labour Party will be quids-in from Labour demands for more taxpayers' money on councillor allowances."

Mr Betts insisted the committee was not calling for a "blanket increase" but an independent assessment in each area as to whether allowances were set at the correct level.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Sign up you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy notice .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in

MORE ABOUT